Socialist and Islamist Agree Democrat Win is Good

As I was growing up one of the things that I was told is that I would be judged by the friends that I kept, “Bird of a Feather,” and all of that. So I’m reading the comments on the U.S. election results, results that indicate that power ceded in American politics over to the Democrats and what I’m I seeing? All of the countries in the world community that wish to do America harm are applauding the Democrat take over of the Senate and Congress. …Hum interesting… (This can’t be good.)

Europe, the Middle East and Asia all with their own reasons to wish defeat, not only on a particular political party in America but defeat of the entire American way of life, all approve of the political shift in power in America. (Click on Win is Good)

But from Paris to Pakistan, politicians, analysts and ordinary citizens said Wednesday they hoped the Democratic takeover of both Houses of Congress would force Bush to adopt a more conciliatory approach to global crises, and teach a president many see as a "cowboy" a lesson in humility.

What is interesting is that at the same time the world community is concerned with a sudden pull out from Iraq and whether or not the Democrats will effect world commerce by becoming protectionist of U.S. jobs and attempt to address U.S. trade deficits.

You can’t have it both ways, what the world community and the U.S. voters are about to discover is if you buy the cow you get the milk. Yes the milk does indeed come along with the cow even if the milk is sour.

Democrats and their world allies have worked long and hard to sour the milk of U.S. politics and now that they've succeeded a Democrat win means an alignment with a more radical Socialist social worldview.

As well, that same win could mean that the Socialist economic concepts that the world has adapted could be apply in America. That possiblity wouldn’t bode well for the world’s economy because nowhere in the world where socialism is presently being applied, in some form, is the socialist economic model working.

In an extraordinary joint statement, more than 200 Socialist members of the European Parliament hailed the American election results as "the beginning of the end of a six-year nightmare for the world."

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has consistently railed against the Bush administration, called the election "a reprisal vote."

In Paris, American expatriates and French citizens alike packed the city's main American haunts to watch results overnight and early Wednesday, with some standing to cheer or boo as vote tabulations came in.

One Frenchman, 53-year-old teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew.

"Americans are realizing that you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes," he said. "You can't fool everybody all the time _ and I think that's what Bush and his administration are learning today."

Socialist Europeans, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Middle Eastern Muslims, Parisians, American expatriates and French citizens alike all agree that Democrats in control of the Senate and Congress is as it should be. Really? Is that a good thing for the world?

One Pakistani lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result, but was hoping for more. Bush "deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence,"

I’ve heard many American Liberals express that same sentiment as Pakistan’s Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, interesting how like minds think similar thoughts. So according to the world and American voters President Bush and Conservatives were the problem for all of the world’s ills?

Even though Europe is presently in economic and social chaos, Islam is threatening to take over Europe and Asia and the U.N. is absolute feckless in doing anything about tyrants who threaten the world with potential nuclear war and oil embargos.

Fine. From this point on we all should expect world peace. No more suicide bombing, no more attacks on anyone in the world that includes Israel! We’re supposed to be able to live in peace right?

And on the economic front no more European attempts to destroy the American economy, and no more China attempting to gain economy world dominance. No more religious jihads and fatwas’, No more kidnapping of America’s and no more beheadings.

Let’s just all get along like one big happy world family because that is what the world wanted right? Democrats are now in control of American politics and now that socialist of the world are in control of all world powers (except Islam) that means that we can now all live in complete harmony and peace right?

After all like the French say, “you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion…”

Well I suppose that we should be just like the French seeing that they’ve already lost their country to economic stagnation and Islamicization. I suppose the sour milk of French socialism will taste great with their French sour dough bread.

Just like the recent sour milk of America politics that Democrats employed to win this midterm election will accompany the sour reforms that Americans will be forced to drink.

You can’t have it both ways world, with the socialist political victory that Democrats achieved in America comes socialist economic reforms and those reforms will be import to the world, a world that is already failing economically.

And for this the world cheers?

From Critics to Control

Congratulations Liberals you’ve convinced the American people that you are the answer to all of America’s problems. You now possess the Congress and could have the Senate as well.

You should be warned though that there is a difference from working demolitions than working construction. You have spent 6 years tearing down the Bush administration and Conservatives so the real question is what you will do to build America up.

All of the visceral and personal attacks against Republicans how do you now exercise statesmanship when that concept has been lost for so long.

You did not work with Republicans when you were in the minority you subverted and obstructed so it will be interesting to see you reach across the aisle now asking for Republicans to work with you.

It will also be interesting to see how much of the blame that you are willing to shoulder now that you are in control.

Will you farther divide America by subpoenas and investigations on the Bush administration, will you impeach President Bush, will you de-fund the war in Iraq or will you cut out the President’s tax cuts and raise taxes.

Will your new found power be good for America or will there be chaos in American government for the next two years.

You can not blame the Republicans from this point on because you are now responsible, any mistakes made will be yours, and any corruption found will be yours, no more excuses for not getting anything done.

You called the 109^th Congress the “do nothing” Congress so we expect you to get things done.

You’re in control, you are in leadership, you are responsible no more finger pointing, no more blaming, it’s in your hands now.

America is waiting for your leadership. America is waiting for the answers that you will have to provide.

My hope for you is that America is not as critical of you as you have been, but that remains to be seen.

U.S. Troops say Stay the Course at Home Too!

With a potentially historic U.S. midterm election on Tuesday and the war in Iraq a major issue at the polls, many soldiers said the United States should not abandon its effort here. Such a move, enlisted soldiers and officers said, would set Iraq on a path to civil war, give new life to the insurgency and create the possibility of a failed state after nearly four years of fighting to implant democracy.

Never thought to ask the soldiers fighting the war but when one takes an up close and personal look these brave souls just want to finish the job. Sure everyone wants peace but if war is declared on America are Americans not going to defend themselves? (Click on U.S. Troops)

9/11 is but a memory, so easy to forget. It is easy to forget that Democrats overwhelmingly voted to give President Bush authority to go to war with Iraq. Many of the most vocal of the critics voted for war with Iraq. Didn’t you Senator Kerry?

Since Iraq has been the focal point of conflict between the East and the West most of the terrorist have congregated there to fight. What that means to the average American is that we have not been attacked in 9/11 fashion since the day the twin towers fell.

However there is another conflict and that conflict is related to whether we prevail in Iraq or we leave Ira q defeated. That conflict is the Left against the Right in American politics.

The soldiers declined to discuss the political jousting back home, but they expressed support for the Bush administration's approach to the war, which they described as sticking with a tumultuous situation to give Iraq a chance to stand on its own.

This election is not a referendum on any one person this election is a referendum on a nation, a country our soul. This election is an assessment on whether the words of Osama bin Laden are true. In 1998 after declaring war on America bin Laden stated that he was convinced that American soldiers would leave the Middle East defeated and shamed. Bin Laden took note of what happened to American soldiers in Mogadishu during the 1993 battle where after taking casualties President Clinton withdrew all American troops. Bin Laden said that he realized then that if America would ever take casualties in a hard fought battle they would withdrawal in defeat and humiliation like they did from Somalia.

Leading Democrats have argued for a timeline to bring U.S. troops home, because obvious progress has been elusive, especially in Baghdad, and even some Republican lawmakers have recently called for a change in strategy. But soldiers criticized the idea of a precipitate withdrawal, largely because they believe their hard work would go for naught.

Americans voting today will either make bin Laden a prophet or a liar; a brilliant military strategist or a radical Islamic Jihadist Zealot.

"This is a worthwhile endeavor," said Maj. Gen. Benjamin Mixon, commander of Multinational Division North and the 25th Infantry Division. "Nothing that is worthwhile is usually easy, and we need to give this more time for it to all come together. We all want to come home, but we have a significant investment here, and we need to give the Iraqi army and the Iraqi people a chance to succeed."

What America does today will resound throughout the world as either the day that the West bowed before Islam or whether America asserts to bin Laden and the world that she is no paper tiger.

"It's still fragile enough now that if the coalition were to leave, it would embolden the insurgents. A lot of people have put their trust and faith in us to see it to the end. It would be an extreme betrayal for us to leave."--Capt. Mike Lingenfelter, 32, of Panhandle, Tex.,

Will America vote today for betrayal or trust and faith? I’m betting that America will exercise its vote by demonstrating that we can be depended upon to keep faith we will demonstrate that we are a Nation that finishes our commitments.

We will not change direction and we will not change course because the direction in which are going and the course that is set before us is the right direction the course that is set is set true and we will defeat those who made the wrong assessment about the character of American leadership, soldiers and the American people.

Our vote today will show America's resolve to complete the mission. We owe it to so many; the Iraqi people, the American soldiers, our fallen in arms, and the American people.

If today's vote is a referendum on the war in Iraq our vote today will say, “We ain’t leaving ‘til the job is done!” And nobody will be mad but those who hate America!

Who will the Democrats Blame?

November 9, or 10 after the recounts of the recounts and Democrats realize that they’ve been rejected by America for the third consecutive time in recent elections, who will they blame?

There’s enough blame to go around but I’m betting on a few prime candidates.

Howard Dean will be blamed because his 50 state plan failed and his inability to fund raise had Democrats borrowing millions of dollars that would have typically raised by the DNC.

Nancy Pelosi will be blamed for the toxic atmosphere that she helped to create in Washington D.C. Pelosi has created so much friction in D.C. that she is now considered the primary cause of Global Warming.

Harry Reid will be blamed because he single handedly destroyed the Democrats meme “the Culture of Corruption.” Reid has taken more than his share of Jack Abramhoff related money, not to mention his 1.1 million dollar land deal in which he had to redo his Senate ethic committee reports, Democrats have had to reconfigure their whole attack plan on Republicans because of Reid.

Former President Clinton will be blamed for going on Fox News Sunday and reminding the America people that his administration could have killed or captured Osama bin Laden 10 times but failed they came closer than anyone else but they tried and failed. They tried and they failed!

John Kerry will be blamed for igniting the firestorm that brought Conservatives to the polls in hugh numbers. Voters who might not have come without Mr. Kerry’s ever so carefully crafted and nuanced comments on the intelligence of soldiers defending America in Iraq.

Diebolt will be blamed because it will accurately tally a Republican win which will conflict with all of the Democrat’s polling and all Liberals know that the Machines were fixed by the dastardly Republicans. The Republicans stole the election or the Republican repressed the Democrat vote or Democrat voters were confused by the electronic voting machines! Or all of the above.

Karl Rove will be blamed because hey he’s Karl Rove!

And last but not least:

The American people will be blamed for being so stupid as not to have accepted all of the hatemongering and political hateful epithets against the President and the Conservatives and as far Democrats are concerned all of the American people should be sent to Iraq.

NYT: Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program

Boy did the Times screw up! What was supposed to be a November surprise, you know one more poke at Bush has turned into complete justification for the war in Iraq according to Jim Geraughty of National Review Online. (Click on NYT:Confirms)

That’s right boys and girls I don’t stutter. The Times the bastion of anti-Bush news all the time in their attempt to show just how dumb the Bush administration is just showed THEIR collective ignorance. They’ve JUST SHOWED THAT BUSH WAS RIGHT! And they don’t even know it!

How so? Okay for all my slow witted Liberal friends I’ll go slow.

The Times reported that the federal government set up a Web site to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war. The Bush administration did so under pressure from Congressional Republicans who had said they hoped to “leverage the Internet” to find new evidence of the prewar dangers posed by Saddam Hussein.

Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf War.

Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.

Geraughty asks, is this sentence referring to 1990, before the Persian Gulf War? Or 2002, months before the invasion of Iraq? Because "Iraq is a year away from building a nuclear bomb" was supposed to be a myth, a lie that Bush used to trick us into war.

And yet here is the New York Times, saying that Iraq had a "how to manual" on how to build a nuclear bomb, and could have had a nuke in a year.


Geraughty reports Iraq had all the know-how, all the plans, all the designs, "charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building." Unless they were keeping these documents around as future material for paper airplanes, all this stuff constituted a plan of action for some point in the future; but to complete creating these weapons, they would have needed stuff.

I don't know an exact list of what they would have needed, but articles like this one give a good idea. Sounds like you need a firing mechanism (the right kind of firearm would suffice), some fairly common industrial equipment like a lathe, material for the bomb casing, some fairly common conventional explosives, all of which would have been easy to get in Iraq.

Oh, and, of course, the nuclear material itself Yellowcake

So the New York Times, confirms that Iraq had a "how to manual" on how to build a nuclear bomb, and could have had a nuke in a year. In addition to that Iraq could have easily put this information into the hands of terrorist.

Geraughty makes this hard hitting point, “I'm sorry, did the New York Times just put on the front page that IRAQ HAD A NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM AND WAS PLOTTING TO BUILD AN ATOMIC BOMB?”

What? Wait a minute. The entire mantra of the war critics has been "no WMDs, no WMDs, no threat, no threat", for the past three years solid. Now we're being told that the Bush administration erred by making public information that could help any nation build an atomic bomb.

So I’d say mistakes were made but in pointing out the mistake that the Bush administration errantly posted on the internet Saddam’s nuclear plans the Times actually told the truth that Saddam did have the capability the know-how and the plan to seek out and build WMD and was within a year of accomplishing that feat. That’s the reason that the President said that we went to war.

That is the reason that all Democrats should be swept out of office on Tuesday. Thank you New York Times!

Are John Kerry’s Pants on Fire?

Senator Kerry, Chris Matthews and the whole lot of the main stream media must be wearing asbestos pants because the smell of smoke is in the air!

You all know the remarks that got Mr. Kerry on the hot seat!

"You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

And then the brilliant Democrat and Liberal followed up will this retort.

"I apologize to no one for my criticism of the president and of his broken policy."

But after thinking about it the comedic Senator from the fun loving state of Massachusetts where marriage is a joke decided that his remarks were all in good clean fun. Well maybe not so good and definitely not so clean but to Kerry its fun bashing Bush.

Kerry said his comment was "a botched joke about the president and the president's people, not about the troops ... and they know that's what I was talking about."

Yeah Senator we know what you were talking about after all you don’t have to actually say what you mean you can just say anything and we’re suppose to know that whatever you say means that President Bush did it. All Liberals know that!

Sort of like Chadgate when you Liberals tried to divine what Floridian voters really intended by their unpunched little paper tabs on the voters ballots. You all tried to convince Americans that you knew what the unpunched, semi-punched, and dimpled voting ballots meant. No wonder Senator Kerry thinks the White house knew what he meant. Liberals can read minds and they think that rest of us mere mortals can as well!

But wait Kerry Aides say that this is all one big mistake they claim that Senator Kerry left out a couple of words and that those words make all the difference in the world.

Aides said the senator had mistakenly dropped a few words from his prepared remarks, which was originally written to say "you end up getting us stuck in a war in Iraq." In that context, they said, it was clear Kerry was referring to President Bush, not to the troops.

Okay let’s add those words.

"You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don't, you end up getting us stuck in Iraq."

Huh?

Is the Senator intimating that President Bush is a high school dropout? President Bush received equal or better grades in College than Senator Kerry that’s well known. President Bush also has an earned MBA so apparently he studied harder than the Senator, so the President had to do his homework and make an effort to be smart.

Is that what Senator Kerry meant? Nope what the Senator means is Liberals are so stupid that he can say anything and they will run to defend him and attempt to see nuance where there is none a la Chris Matthews!

It is what it is! It’s Liberal disdain for our armed forces. And John Kerry has been spitting in the face of American Soldiers for decades. But to insult the America people with his bifurcated and opaque gibberish is just sad! Senator the only people in America that believe your Aide’s cockamamie stories are the ones who caught Fahrenheit 9/11 twice and swear that it is true, oh yeah and Chris Matthews.

Now Kerry says that he sincerely regretted that his words were "misinterpreted to imply anything negative about those in uniform." And he said he was "sorry about a botched joke" about Bush.

Misinterpretation, botched joke? That doesn’t sound like an apology to me. That sounds like someone still unwilling to own up to what he said after he said that he would not apologize mind you.

What’s that smell? Is that the smell of sulfur Senator Kerry? You’d better check your pants Senator because I think they’re on fire!

Democrat’s Referendum of Hate

"I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for,"--Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman told Democrats gathered at a Manhattan hotel, in quotes picked up by the New York Daily News.

This election, more and more and more, is becoming a referendum on George Bush, his failed policies, both overseas and here at home and the rubberstamp Congress. And the more it becomes a referendum like that, the better we do.—Charles Schumer, Fox News Sunday

November 7^th 2006-- Here we are again, in 2000 Democrats were boosting that they were the majority in the Country. In 2004 after several viewings of Fahrenheit 9/11 Democrats blurry eyed and emphatic claimed that they didn’t know anyone who would vote for President Bush.

So now a few days away from elections Liberals are still fixated on George W. Bush. It’s an obsession! Bush isn’t running his name isn’t on any ballot and the two times that Democrats tried to defeat him they lost. (Click on Hate)

Democrats let a stupid, incompetent, narrowly focused, inarticulate religious Cowboy Conservative defeated them twice! What exactly does that say about the Democrats? It’s hard to believe that with all of the faults that President Bush has (according to Democrats) they could not beat him.

So why in God’s name are they running against him the third time? Democrats are calling these elections a referendum on George Bush they hate this man so deeply that they are literally dedicating this election to President Bush. So what do you Liberals want to beat him in absentia?

Never have I seen such hatred, such vitriol as is emanating from the Democrat party. It is plain to see that these folk are not well. Liberals have even made a movie depicting the assassination of President Bush it’s the most deprived thing that could be imagined but the Liberals are defending this film. It’s incredible!

Democrats wish to force Conservatives into the closet to never appear in the public square again. They thought that they accomplished this in 2000 and again in 2004 only to be disappointed that they could not yet embrace the Age of Aquarius with open arms.

But now Liberals have waged an all out war against the President, his policies and all Conservatives. Also most of the Democrats comments about Conservatives have been overtly negative. And some one please tell me how do the Democrats expect to attract cross-over voters when they hate Conservatives and everything that they stand for?

This election is a referendum as Senator Schumer has characterized it only it is a referendum of the seething hate that Democrats have fermented in this country and throughout the world.

Democrats expect voters to be driven to the polls in about a week because of hate. Democrats hate Conservatives, religion, America’s war effort, and President Bush.

And they think that you do too! Hey don’t let six years of bash bashing, lying on Bush, demeaning Bush, demonizing Bush and blocking Bush’s policy go to waste.

Go get out and vote! “I feel much hate in you young Skywalker!” Use the “hate” Democrats! Really this is not a referendum on George Bush this is a referendum on how hateful people can really be.

And may the hate be with you on November 7^th! Anyone seen my punch card saber? Oh they’re using Diebolt now? Can you hand count an electronic ballot?